Leigh Whannell's The Invisible Man won't become a horror classic like the 1933 Claude Raines flick. One might argue it's better, considering the modern plot and the terrific work of star Elisabeth Moss.
But classic?
Nah, we won't be talking about this move in 90 years like we are the '33 version. Still, classic or not, this is one reboot that's a helluva lot of fun!
The 2020 mystery/sci-fi/horror flick starts tense and builds on that tension for the full 2-hour run, and that makes Whannell's ending highly satisfying. Elizabeth Moss carries the movie with her best film work yet, but the close-up cinematography really sells the emotional strain by creating a crowded, claustrophobic-like feel for the audience.
The Invisible Man may be the title, but it's the female lead that's the heart and soul of this movie.
Saturday, February 29, 2020
Sunday, February 09, 2020
2020 Academy Awards! Early Picks!
It's red carpet time! Let's get this Oscar party started.
My picks for the 2020 Academy Awards major contests are:
Achievement in Cinematography
Rodrigo Prieto: The Irishman
Lawrence Sher: Joker
Jarin Blaschke: The Lighthouse
Roger Deakins: 1917
Robert Richardson: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Who should win: Jarin Blaschke, The Lighthouse
Who will win: Roger Deakins, 1917
Achievement in Costume Design
Sandy Powell and Christopher Peterson: The Irishman
Mayes C. Rubeo: Jojo Rabbit
Mark Bridges: Joker
Jacquelin Durran: Little Women
Arianne Phillips: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Who should win: Mayes C. Rubeo, Jojo Rabbit
Who will win: Mayes C. Rubeo, Jojo Rabbit
Actress in A Supporting Role
Kathy Bates: Richard Jewell
Laura Dern: Marriage Story
Scarlett Johansson: Jojo Rabbit
Florence Pugh: Little Women
Margot Robbie: Bombshell
Who should win: Kathy Bates, Richard Jewell
Who will win: Scarlett Johansson, Jojo Rabbit
Actress in a Leading Role
Cynthia Erivo: Harriet
Scarlett Johansson: Marriage Story
Saoirse Ronan: Little Women
Charlize Theron: Bombshell
Renee Zellweger: Judy
Who should win: Cynthia Erivo, Harriet
Who will win: Renee Zellweger, Judy
Actor in a Supporting Role
Tom Hanks: A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
Anthony Hopkins: The Two Popes
Al Pacino: The Irishman
Joe Pesci: The Irishman
Brad Pitt: One Upon a Time in Hollywood
Who should win: Joe Pesci, The Irishman
Who will win: Tom Hanks, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
Actor on a Leading Role
Antonio Banderas: Pain and Glory
Leonardo DiCaprio: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Adam Driver: Marriage Story
Joaquin Pheonix: Joker
Jonathan Pryce: The Two Popes
Who should win: Joaquin Phoenix, Joker
Who will win: Joaquin Phoenix, Joker
Directing
Martin Scorsese: The Irishman
Todd Phillips: Joker
Sam Mendes: 1917
Quintin Tarantino: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Bong Joon Ho: Parasite
Who should win: Sam Mendes, 1917
Who will win: Sam Mendes, 1917
Best Picture
Ford v Ferrari
The Irishman
Jojo Rabbit
Joker Little Women
Marriage Story
1917
One Upon a Time in Hollywood
Parasite
Which should win: 1917
Which will win: 1917
My picks for the 2020 Academy Awards major contests are:
Achievement in Cinematography
Rodrigo Prieto: The Irishman
Lawrence Sher: Joker
Jarin Blaschke: The Lighthouse
Roger Deakins: 1917
Robert Richardson: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Who should win: Jarin Blaschke, The Lighthouse
Who will win: Roger Deakins, 1917
Achievement in Costume Design
Sandy Powell and Christopher Peterson: The Irishman
Mayes C. Rubeo: Jojo Rabbit
Mark Bridges: Joker
Jacquelin Durran: Little Women
Arianne Phillips: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Who should win: Mayes C. Rubeo, Jojo Rabbit
Who will win: Mayes C. Rubeo, Jojo Rabbit
Actress in A Supporting Role
Kathy Bates: Richard Jewell
Laura Dern: Marriage Story
Scarlett Johansson: Jojo Rabbit
Florence Pugh: Little Women
Margot Robbie: Bombshell
Who should win: Kathy Bates, Richard Jewell
Who will win: Scarlett Johansson, Jojo Rabbit
Actress in a Leading Role
Cynthia Erivo: Harriet
Scarlett Johansson: Marriage Story
Saoirse Ronan: Little Women
Charlize Theron: Bombshell
Renee Zellweger: Judy
Who should win: Cynthia Erivo, Harriet
Who will win: Renee Zellweger, Judy
Actor in a Supporting Role
Tom Hanks: A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
Anthony Hopkins: The Two Popes
Al Pacino: The Irishman
Joe Pesci: The Irishman
Brad Pitt: One Upon a Time in Hollywood
Who should win: Joe Pesci, The Irishman
Who will win: Tom Hanks, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
Actor on a Leading Role
Antonio Banderas: Pain and Glory
Leonardo DiCaprio: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Adam Driver: Marriage Story
Joaquin Pheonix: Joker
Jonathan Pryce: The Two Popes
Who should win: Joaquin Phoenix, Joker
Who will win: Joaquin Phoenix, Joker
Directing
Martin Scorsese: The Irishman
Todd Phillips: Joker
Sam Mendes: 1917
Quintin Tarantino: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Bong Joon Ho: Parasite
Who should win: Sam Mendes, 1917
Who will win: Sam Mendes, 1917
Best Picture
Ford v Ferrari
The Irishman
Jojo Rabbit
Joker Little Women
Marriage Story
1917
One Upon a Time in Hollywood
Parasite
Which should win: 1917
Which will win: 1917
Friday, February 07, 2020
1917
Sam Mendes' 1917 is, without a doubt, the best movie of 2019.
The epic, beautifully directed with a focus on symmetry and in a style that looks like one long shot, tells the story of two solders given a near-impossible task during WWI.
The way in which the story is shot makes the viewer feel included in the journey. We flinch, we grimace, we cry because we experience it along with the lead characters.
1917 should win Best Picture at the 2020 Academy Awards, and Mendes deserves the Best Director Oscar.
The epic, beautifully directed with a focus on symmetry and in a style that looks like one long shot, tells the story of two solders given a near-impossible task during WWI.
The way in which the story is shot makes the viewer feel included in the journey. We flinch, we grimace, we cry because we experience it along with the lead characters.
1917 should win Best Picture at the 2020 Academy Awards, and Mendes deserves the Best Director Oscar.
Jojo Rabbit
There's nothing funny about Hitler . . . except when he's an imaginary role model for a 10-year-old boy figuring out the world is more complicated and complex than he's been led to believe.
Sunday, February 02, 2020
The Two Popes
"What a long, strange trip it's been." ~ Grateful Dead
My experience with organized religion has been both long and strange.
Through most of my childhood I attended a Christian fundamentalist church, a log cabin in the mountains of West Virginia where 25-30 people gathered several times each week to fellowship and praise their god. I was moved emotionally by services there: one can't wash the feet of one's pew-mate whilst singing "Amazing Grace," without feeling something akin to the Holy Ghost.
I began doubting the existence of gods in my mid-teens, and by 18 was a full-fledged atheist. Early on, I was an angry atheist. Through my 20s I didn't understand why others couldn't see behind the curtain I'd pulled back for them. And I pulled it back as often as I could.
If you hung out with me at that time there's no doubt that talk turned to religion within the hour.
Despite my disbelief, I missed the ritual and spirituality of a church service, so in my 30s I started attending a local Catholic church. Although I disagreed with a lot of hot-button political issues the Catholic Church is known for, I liked the fact that I left mass feeling hopeful, and not bad, about myself.
From my perspective, the Catholic Church focused on personal improvement and on strengthening a connection with something greater than yourself. I could get behind that. My relationships with family and friends and my connection with my community each meet that standard.
My wife and I converted. At the end of that experience -- and it's a nine month experience -- I had to go through my first confession. I had such respect for the priest who would hear it -- he was also the priest who lead the conversion process -- that I wanted to be completely transparent. I confessed to being an atheist.
His response was perfect: Stop thinking about it. Focus on making society better for others. Serve people. Do good.
It was exactly what I needed to hear, and it allowed me to stop feeling guilty about being an atheist Catholic.
I thought often about my experience as I watched The Two Popes. At its core, Popes is an existential drama; an examination of whether a 2,000 year old institution should modernize to meet the needs of a changing society.
Is change compromise? And if so, is compromise acceptable? The question goes beyond the church and examines who we are as people and as members of society.
The Two Popes, adapted from a play by Anthony McCarten, is well written and well acted, as evidenced by the fact it has three Academy Award nominations (Best Actor, Best Supporting Actor, and Best Adapted Screenplay).
But, the movie's most important quality is its ability to make we viewers consider our connection with something greater without passing judgment on the quality of our humanity.
Saturday, February 01, 2020
Harriet
So, I know I went to History classes. All through junior high, high school, and my freshman year in college. I listened, honestly. I really, really like History.
But, here are some things I didn't know that I learned from Kasi Lemmons' Harriet.
1. Mrs. Tubman's birth name was Araminta "Minty" Ross;
2. Minty was initially married to freedman John Tubman;
3. Minty's family was promised its freedom two generations before, but the current slave owner refused to abide by that agreement;
4. Mrs. Tubman took the name "Harriet" to honor her mother, and the surname "Tubman" to honor her husband. (Although when she made that name change is unclear.);
5. Mrs. Tubman made thirteen trips between the south and north, and personally freed 70 slaves while working with the Undergrounds Railroad. I was astounded to learn this; honestly, I always presumed she stayed in the north and facilitated Railroad efforts from a headquarters;
6. She carried, and used, guns in her work;
6. During the Civil War, Mrs. Tubman worked as a Union spy and led a squad of black soldiers who freed 750 slaves.
All true, I double checked. And Mrs. Tubman did much, much more that simply could not be presented in the movie for the sake of time and plot.
Like many biopics, Harriet feels a little rushed. But in fairness to Lemmon' script and direction, there was so much real-life material the script had to be focused and condensed. Unlike many biopics, Harriet is a story of transformation: we're watching a true-to-life legend change from Minty the slave to Harriet the freedwoman to Moses the emancipator to Mrs. Tubman the social justice warrior.
Cynthia Erivo, nominated for an Academy Award for her performance (and I predict she will win) is remarkable in the lead role. She's required to demonstrate subtleness and fierceness, fear and strength. And she does each with authenticity and skill.
I say it's time to ditch whatever history books a mostly white society creates and sells to a nation of mostly white teachers who teach mostly white students. Let's start using the biopic Harriet as an introduction to all students about Mrs. Tubman and how she changed the world.
But, here are some things I didn't know that I learned from Kasi Lemmons' Harriet.
1. Mrs. Tubman's birth name was Araminta "Minty" Ross;
2. Minty was initially married to freedman John Tubman;
3. Minty's family was promised its freedom two generations before, but the current slave owner refused to abide by that agreement;
4. Mrs. Tubman took the name "Harriet" to honor her mother, and the surname "Tubman" to honor her husband. (Although when she made that name change is unclear.);
5. Mrs. Tubman made thirteen trips between the south and north, and personally freed 70 slaves while working with the Undergrounds Railroad. I was astounded to learn this; honestly, I always presumed she stayed in the north and facilitated Railroad efforts from a headquarters;
6. She carried, and used, guns in her work;
6. During the Civil War, Mrs. Tubman worked as a Union spy and led a squad of black soldiers who freed 750 slaves.
All true, I double checked. And Mrs. Tubman did much, much more that simply could not be presented in the movie for the sake of time and plot.
Like many biopics, Harriet feels a little rushed. But in fairness to Lemmon' script and direction, there was so much real-life material the script had to be focused and condensed. Unlike many biopics, Harriet is a story of transformation: we're watching a true-to-life legend change from Minty the slave to Harriet the freedwoman to Moses the emancipator to Mrs. Tubman the social justice warrior.
Cynthia Erivo, nominated for an Academy Award for her performance (and I predict she will win) is remarkable in the lead role. She's required to demonstrate subtleness and fierceness, fear and strength. And she does each with authenticity and skill.
I say it's time to ditch whatever history books a mostly white society creates and sells to a nation of mostly white teachers who teach mostly white students. Let's start using the biopic Harriet as an introduction to all students about Mrs. Tubman and how she changed the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)